[ad_1]
The “Mona Lisa” has given up one other secret.
Utilizing X-rays to look into the chemical construction of a tiny speck of the celebrated work of art, scientists have gained new perception into the strategies that Leonardo da Vinci used to color his groundbreaking portrait of the girl with the exquisitely enigmatic smile.
The analysis, revealed Wednesday within the Journal of the American Chemical Society, means that the famously curious, realized, and creative Italian Renaissance grasp could have been in a very experimental temper when he set to work on the “Mona Lisa” early within the sixteenth century.
The oil-paint recipe that Leonardo used as his base layer to organize the panel of poplar wooden seems to have been completely different for the “Mona Lisa,” with its personal distinctive chemical signature, the staff of scientists and artwork historians in France and Britain found.
“He was somebody who liked to experiment, and every of his work is totally completely different technically,” stated Victor Gonzalez, the research’s lead creator and a chemist at France’s prime analysis physique, the CNRS. Gonzalez has studied the chemical compositions of dozens of works by Leonardo, Rembrandt and different artists.
“On this case, it’s fascinating to see that certainly there’s a particular approach for the bottom layer of ‘Mona Lisa,’” he stated in an interview with The Related Press.
Particularly, the researchers discovered a uncommon compound, plumbonacrite, in Leonardo’s first layer of paint. The invention, Gonzalez stated, confirmed for the primary time what artwork historians had beforehand solely hypothesized: that Leonardo almost certainly used lead oxide powder to thicken and assist dry his paint as he started engaged on the portrait that now stares out from behind protecting glass within the Louvre Museum in Paris.
One in every of many secrets and techniques
Carmen Bambach, a specialist in Italian artwork and curator at New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Artwork, who was not concerned within the research, known as the analysis “very thrilling” and stated any scientifically confirmed new insights into Leonardo’s portray strategies are “extraordinarily vital information for the artwork world and our bigger international society.”
Discovering plumbonacrite within the “Mona Lisa” attests “to Leonardo’s spirit of passionate and fixed experimentation as a painter – it’s what renders him timeless and fashionable,” Bambach stated by electronic mail.
The paint fragment from the bottom layer of the “Mona Lisa” that was analyzed was barely seen to the bare eye, no bigger than the diameter of a human hair, and got here from the highest right-hand fringe of the portray.
The scientists peered into its atomic construction utilizing X-rays in a synchrotron, a big machine that accelerates particles to nearly the velocity of sunshine. That allowed them to unravel the speck’s chemical make-up. Plumbonacrite is a byproduct of lead oxide, permitting the researchers to say with extra certainty that Leonardo probably used the powder in his paint recipe.
“Plumbonacrite is known as a fingerprint of his recipe,” Gonzalez stated. “It’s the primary time we will truly chemically verify it.”
After Leonardo, Dutch grasp Rembrandt could have used an identical recipe when he was portray within the seventeenth century; Gonzalez and different researchers have beforehand discovered plumbonacrite in his work, too.
“It tells us additionally that these recipes had been handed on for hundreds of years,” Gonzalez stated. “It was an excellent recipe.”
Leonardo is assumed to have dissolved lead oxide powder, which has an orange shade, in linseed or walnut oil by heating the combination to make a thicker, faster-drying paste.
“What you’ll acquire is an oil that has a really good golden shade,” Gonzalez stated. “It flows extra like honey.”
However the “Mona Lisa” — stated by the Louvre to be a portrait of Lisa Gherardini, the spouse of a Florentine silk service provider — and different works by Leonardo nonetheless have other secrets to tell.
“There are lots, lots extra issues to find, for certain. We’re barely scratching the floor,” Gonzalez stated. “What we’re saying is just a bit brick extra within the data.”
[ad_2]
